By November 5, 2012 5 Comments Read More →

Hostile Questions: Camille Paglia

I’m not the first to be hostile to Camille Paglia. As the author of Sexual Personae; Break, Blow, Burn; Sex, Art, and American Culture; and Vamps & Tramps, Paglia is something of an expert at ruffling feathers. (Speaking of feathers, she also wrote The Birds, a study of Alfred Hitchcock.) The worlds zigs; Paglia zags. The world says this here; Paglia says no, that there. She’s pretty much unafraid of anything or anyone . . . which is why I received that 3 a.m. phone call. I’m ready, captain. I’ve been training for this for years. Just a second while I finish hyperventilating and then we’ll proceed.

Paglia pondering the pros/cons of kicking my ass.

Just who do you think you are?

I’m a boisterous gal from the Snow Belt of upstate New York, where fighting your way through icy, wind-blown drifts was the norm. I was born in an enclave of Italian immigrants in the factory town of Endicott, where very few members of my grandparents’ generation spoke English. There was a very concrete, wham-bam sound to their rural Italian dialect that I’ve preserved in my own writing in English. And were those old ladies feisty! They could knock people down like bowling pins. Plus they were colossally opinionated on every subject—a trait I inherited and wear proudly. It’s why I have no problem in attacking the entire art world—as I do in my new book.

Where do you get off?

I have the soul of a warrior. It’s no coincidence that the name Camilla descends through my maternal family, who came from the Volscian region in Central Italy. In Vergil’s Aeneid, the fierce Amazon Camilla is a Volscian—a tribe who were historically the most implacable of Rome’s enemies. The high citadel of the village where my mother was born, Ceccano, rests on huge and still visible blocks of stone laid down by the Volscians in 600 B.C. The puny Mayflower be damned—this is my heritage!

What’s the big idea?

In Glittering Images, my sixth book, I trace the dazzling evolution of artistic styles in art from Egyptian tomb-paintings to George Lucas’ Revenge of the Sith. People are way too visually overloaded these days with fragmented e-mail and Twitter and with dizzyingly flashing and lousily designed websites. This book, which I spent five years writing, is intended to focus and enhance readers’ power of perception as well as give them a concise overview of the thrilling drama of art history.

What is your problem, man?

I hate post-structuralism and postmodernism and anything that stinks of pretentious jargon. I want people to use their instincts and intuition and respond naturally and freely to art again. I’m a 1960s baby-boomer who was heavily influenced by the Beat movement in college. I think writing in English should have force, rhythm, and directness. But parents have bankrupted themselves to send their kids to elite universities where they were poisoned with pointless ideological crap. Humanities departments in the U.S. have gradually shrunk in importance and prestige over the past three decades—it’s a self-induced cultural tragedy. With Glittering Images, I’m trying to persuade young art lovers to rebel and think for themselves.

Haven’t you done enough?

Unlike the clone professoriate of the elite schools, I can’t turn out books like sausages. I write books very, very slowly because I take them so seriously. I regard nonfiction as the primary literary form of our time and devote immense labor to basic matters of argumentation and style. My 700-page first book, Sexual Personae, which was published in 1990, was probably the last big book written without a computer. Everything was done in longhand and typed up later. I still always write serious work in longhand first. It’s as if I’m a wage-slave in my own factory!

Comments

comments

About the Author:

Dan Kraus, senior editor at Booklist is the producer and director of numerous feature films, most notably the documentary Work Series, and the author of several YA novels, including Rotters and Scowler, both of which won the Odyssey Award.

5 Comments on "Hostile Questions: Camille Paglia"

Trackback | Comments RSS Feed

  1. lml.ahlondon@gmail.com' AHLondon says:

    Love the Hostile Questions. Will visit again. And I would have hyperventilated before having to interview Paglia too. “I can’t turn out books like sausages.” I love her.

  2. stepinspects@gmail.com' Steve Hughes says:

    ‘Pointless ideological crap’

    OK. I’m stealing that one like Milton Berle used to steal jokes.

  3. abs007@rcn.com' Marckus Divitt says:

    Camille Paglia is the real thing: a teacher, a writer, a scholar. Her field, art, is central in culture. She is bold and brave, and she nearly always right. She is always right on. Others cringe behind movements and ideologies. She is an individual.

  4. youngerks@gmail.com' K Younger says:

    Thank you sweet sister (Camille Paglia) for not leaving me out here all alone! Often, when I think I’ve had just about enough, I remember there is one other out there who has the same “problem, man” as I do.

  5. graphic.man@comcast.net' GesuAldus says:

    Questions not so hostile after all. The only hostile questions to Camille Paglia can come from the garden variety femi-nasties who can’t still admit their own hermaphroditic identity — not from the O’Reilly-like macho hostile interviewer, who, to Camille triumphant delight, always ends up colluding and conflating with her solid androgenous embrace.

    Can anyone imagine Camille on Freud’s couch?
    Who would turn out to need psychoanalysis?

Post a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.